Health backdating

the outcome of the trial by not following Court Orders, falsifying documents, misleading the trial Judge for which lead to the wrongful imprisonment of I, Donald Broder, a 75 year old senior on a Friday April 26 – 2004 for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Center without food or medical requirements until I called my son; Jeff Broder on Saturday April 27, 2004 shortly after noon for whom showed up at the Edmonton Remand And now in 2011 the Alberta Justice Department garnished my wife, Joyce Broder’s, bank account of her pension monies for Court costs imposed against me within Actions in Calgary Law Court against Lawyers for which have been wrongfully dismissed and that my terminally ill wife, Joyce Broder, had nothing to do with, as she resides in a Good Samaritans – Long Term Care Facility diagnosed in the later stages of Dementia and 1) The Defendant; Donald H.

health backdating-60

Sawers, or should I say from ambushing herself because she had forced the pleading closed within action 9703-12949 before she applied for probate.

And we will also prove that a Court Order exists from Justice Myra Bielby that ordered the file and transcripts be turned over to Alison Redford – Attorney General of Alberta for an investigation into possible criminal charges be laid against the Broder family but the evidence will prove otherwise that criminal charges should have been laid against all Justices and lawyers involved for their criminal conduct of conspiracy to defraud an innocent senior citizen and his family.

31335 and was provided by;1909 – 1914 – Wild Horses from Montana and Wyoming, USA were herded up to Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and held in a large pasture at the Rose and Bell Livery Stable for which now is part of Edmonton and to date the RCMP – K Division, Kingsway Garden Mall and the Municipal Airport exist on this land. To be posted at the end of the Litigation 9703-12949 Tab and as relied upon as precedence during the Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 Application heard by Master Quinn and the Appeal of Master Quinn heard by Justice C. Clarke, Edmonton Law Courts.1997 – March – Donald H. Heard: November 9, 1992 – Judgment: December 15, 1992.

1914 – 1918 – 1st World War started in 1914 for which Edmund Broder’s employer Rose and Bell Livery Stable was also called upon to break horses for use by the United States of America and Canadian Military. Broder’s son Craig Broder was served a demand letter to return the Broder Buck to his siblings. ” The Personal Representatives must be appointed by the Surrogate Courts to act on behalf of the Estate of the deceased and named as Plaintiffs for the action to have standing within the Courts.

This evidence provided within this website will walk you the reader through the conspiracy to defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, Donald Broder committed by his own lawyers; Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates, Bryan Kickham and Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson, Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company and Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham to frame him in order to protect the Plaintiffs Lawyer; Elizabeth Mac Innis of Weir Bowen from losing the law suit because she had forced closed the pleadings on herself by way of Court Order before she filed The Application for Probate with The Surrogate Courts and as such the action was frivolous, vexatious and abuse of process without Personal Representatives that had not been appointed by the Surrogate Courts. Clarke, Myra Bielby, Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan, The Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth Mac Innis of Weir Bowen had obtained a court order in December 2000 from Justice J L Lewis to file the Certificate of Readiness on February 15, 2001 allowing time for the Defendants to make a Jury Trial Application before Chief Justice A. Wachowich, then leave of the court was granted or a time extension during my Jury trial application from Chief Justice A. Wachowich to close the pleadings on March 15, 2001 to allow time for my outstanding 129 application challenging the Plaintiff’s standing or right to sue as the Application for Probate had never been before the Surrogate Courts and Personal Representatives did not exist.

Personal Representatives therefore did not exist at the time the Court ordered the Pleadings closed within the said action and as such even if the Application for Probate was successful and Personal Representatives would be appointed they could not be add/substituted as Plaintiff’s on The Statement of Claim within the said action as the expiration of the applicable limitation period as defined as two years within the Limitations of Actions Act to add or substitute a new claimant / Plaintiff had lapsed. The action was to be dismissed at my 129 application and no jury would be required because only Personal Representatives could sue on behalf of a deceased and the Plaintiff’s lacked standing to sue in their personal capacity.

of the Original Statement of Claim to add or substitute a new Plaintiff ‘s within Action 9703-12949 as set out within Alberta’s New Statute of Limitation of Action Act.

The Personal Representatives do not exist as probate still has not been applied for at this time and it is now almost 30 years since the death of Edmund Broder and the New Statute of Limitation was adopted on March 1, 1999 for which now includes a 10 year drop dead clause and will govern the Application for Probate and should be dismissed if and when applied for at The Surrogate Courts.2000 – December – Elizabeth Mac Innis of Weir Bowen requests consent to close the pleadings within action 9703-12949 which was declined by Donald Broder as he continued to explain to his lawyer that his sibling could not sue him only Personal Representatives had a legal right to make demands for the return of Estate property or start a court action to recover Estate property. Wachowich order The Pleadings are closed within Action 9703-12949 as Elizabeth Mac Innis of Weir Bowen, Lawyer for the Plaintiffs forced them closed on herself before she applied for probate.

Passed away on April 11, 2012 with his bank account garnished his wife Joyce M. Kenneth and then accepted another ,000 to file The Application for leave to; and with the assistance of; orchestrated the loss of his own client, by colluding and orchestrating the documents relied on within The Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada willfully excluding the necessary court filed documents that would exonerate his client to; thereby successfully obtaining a dismissal of; The Application for Leave to; to cover up his participation with The Alberta Justice Department’s acts of collusion and conspiracy for which he was a part of that framed an innocent senior citizen therefore defrauding his own client Donald H.

Tags: , ,